tool-hub.xyz 关于

Android设备分布式威胁防御

Consensus-Constrained Dual-Federated Optimization with Client-Side Dynamic Weighting for Distributed Android Device Threat Defense

0 arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG 2026-11-09 阅读原文 ↗

原文链接:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09470v1

中文导读

分布式Android设备威胁防御可以不收集原始客户端数据进行模型训练,但部分参与和变异性仍存在。该研究提出了一种基于客户端动态权重的共识约束双联邦优化方法,旨在解决此类问题。

导读由机器生成,结论与数字请以原文为准。

原文正文(未翻译)

Smartphones, smart-home hubs, and wearables are increasingly exposed to sophisticated Android malware, while centralized threat-detection pipelines raise privacy and scalability concerns. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without collecting raw client data, but partial participation and variation in local model quality can destabilize global optimization. In this article, we propose DW-FedADMM, a federated optimization framework that combines primal-dual coordination with performance-dependent client-side weighting. The dynamic coefficient modulates each participating client's local state before the augmented-Lagrangian update, while the dual variables regulate disagreement between local and global model states. We evaluate DW-FedADMM on three Android malware benchmarks, namely Drebin, Malgenome, and TUANDROMD, with 5, 10, and 15 clients holding IID data shards, partial client participation, and communication budgets of 5 and 10 rounds. Each configuration is repeated with ten random seeds. DW-FedADMM obtains the highest seed-averaged accuracy on Drebin (97.64% +/- 0.20%) and the best mean accuracy in 9 of the 18 dataset-client-round configurations, including 7 of the 9 configurations with a 10-round budget. Pooled over all configurations, it reaches 95.42% accuracy, 94.62% F1-score, 96.06% precision, and 99.45% AUC, compared with 95.32%, 94.51%, 95.56%, and 99.41% for FedADMM, while also giving the lowest mean false-positive rate and the smallest client update norm among the six compared methods. Both primal-dual methods are well ahead of the averaging- and proximal-based baselines on Malgenome and TUANDROMD, where the latter often remain at the majority-class solution when clients are fragmented. The gain of dynamic weighting over FedADMM is most pronounced on Drebin and with the longer communication budget, where it also reduces the variation across seeds.

原文约 1917 字,读原文 ↗

讨论0

无需登录;同一 IP 每小时最多 8 条,发言请不要包含攻击性内容。

正在加载讨论……